Hacker News (curated)new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs| show hidden

I'm not sure what the point being made is. No one is forcing anyone to come up with anti-LLM scripts...?


The point is that something like this exists, or had to have existed. What lengths a person took to prevent de-obfuscation of code. The commenter above is saying it's sickening that a LLM has to "think" about this in order to not analyze the code, and I think it's equally sickening that, if someone wants to achieve said goal, they must think about stuff like that

Are you sure?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact | github