Hacker News (curated)new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs| show hidden

Question for people who know about this: why do we have hundreds of root certificate authorities, when a vulnerability on a single one can break encryption?

Wouldn't it make more sense to have 5 or so that can be more closely monitored, so something like the eMudhra certificates would probably be found before the certificates are deployed?



And which countries shall run those 5?

The US, which already centralises the internet by running .com and developed most of the software using these certificates?

It's not like they cannot introduce a bad certificate right now. We would be just be taking the ability from all other countries from doing the same.


The permanent members of the Security Council, obviously.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact | github