Hacker News (curated)new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs| show hidden

Interesting, the Match Strike (2nd place in 2023) seems counter intuitive to me. The flames are leading the match with the following edge clearly visible.

When I first saw his inkjet shot I refused to believe it wasn't completely CGI. So, I take it there is a degree of artistic freedom to compose a shot that may not be indicative of the actual subject? Then the line is drawn with AI enhancement?



Flames are somewhat transparent. That's why you can see the wick of a candle through the flame that surrounds it. The same is happening here, the flame is all around the match head, not just in front.

Regarding this image, the article states: "Bielfeldt does not use AI in his images, preferring to rely on traditional techniques."

So I would presume it also refers to his other works?


Absolutely, I'm not suggesting AI was used, just curious about the level of artistic creativity allowed when composing the image.

For me, colour enhancements are expected, compositions is where we leave reality. Either way, all of these images are an amazing insight into a world too small to see with the naked eye.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact | github